News World
  • Facebook
    Facebook
  • Twitter
    Twitter
  • Pinterest
    Pinterest
  • +
  • Linkedin
    Linkedin
  • WhatsApp
    WhatsApp
  • Email
    Email
SHARE THIS
  • Facebook
    Facebook
  • Twitter
    Twitter
  • Pinterest
    Pinterest
  • Linkedin
    Linkedin
  • WhatsApp
    WhatsApp
  • Email
    Email

The tragic shooting of Harambe, a 17-year-old silverback gorilla, at the Cincinnati Zoo has some people completely livid. And we can understand why. A seriously majestic, endangered species was killed by a human. (The ape had just celebrated his birthday and the zoo had thrown him a party just days before his death, which pulls on our heart strings even harder.)

And while we’re sympathetic for the death of Harambe, the reality is, a 4-year-old boy could have been ripped apart.

Amanda O’Donoughue, a former zookeeper who worked closely with gorillas specifically during her career, made a poignant post to her Facebook page after watching the intense video where the animal aggressively drags the boy through the water multiple times.

Her response pretty much addresses all of the wild accusations flying around the internet, like “the gorilla was trying to save the boy!” and “the gorilla should have been lured away from the boy with treats!”

While gorillas are known to be relatively docile, when threatened, their animal instinct kicks in. (Surprise, surprise.) Male gorillas weigh approximately the same as a motorcycle and are 10-times stronger than an adult human. They are literally programmed to tear apart anything that slightly threatens them or their tribe.

And that’s how Harambe was responding.

Others online asked, “why not shoot the gorilla with tranquilizers?” Which sounds like maybe a good solution, but O’Donoughue points out that we don’t know how long it would take for the tranq to kick in, and furthermore, when they did start to work, the ape might have fallen and crushed the boy.

Shooting the animal, says O’Donoughue, is what the zoo’s highly skilled dart team had to do. At the end of the day, they are trained to save human life in an emergency situation such as this.

From her post:

“I have worked with Gorillas as a zookeeper while in my twenties (before children) and they are my favorite animal (out of dozens) that I have ever worked closely with. I am gonna go ahead and list a few facts, thoughts and opinions for those of you that aren’t familiar with the species itself, or how a zoo operates in emergency situations.

Now Gorillas are considered ‘gentle giants’ at least when compared with their more aggressive cousins the chimpanzee, but a 400+ pound male in his prime is as strong as roughly 10 adult humans. What can you bench press? OK, now multiply that number by ten. An adult male silverback gorilla has one job, to protect his group. He does this by bluffing or intimidating anything that he feels threatened by.

In more recent decades, zoos have begun to redesign enclosures, removing all obvious caging and attempting to create a seamless view of the animals for the visitor to enjoy watching animals in a more natural looking habitat. *this is great until little children begin falling into exhibits* which of course can happen to anyone, especially in a crowded zoo-like setting.

I have watched this video over again, and with the silverback’s postering, and tight lips, it’s pretty much the stuff of any keeper’s nightmares… I keep hearing that the Gorilla was trying to protect the boy. I do not find this to be true. Harambe reaches for the boys hands and arms, but only to position the child better for his own displaying purposes.

Males do very elaborate displays when highly agitated, slamming and dragging things about. Typically they would drag large branches, barrels and heavy weighted balls around to make as much noise as possible. Not in an effort to hurt anyone or anything (usually) but just to intimidate. It was clear to me that he was reacting to the screams coming from the gathering crowd.

Harambe was most likely not going to separate himself from that child without seriously hurting him first (again due to mere size and strength, not malicious intent) Why didn’t they use treats? well, they attempted to call them off exhibit (which animals hate), the females in the group came in, but Harambe did not. What better treat for a captive animal than a real live kid!

They didn’t use Tranquilizers for a few reasons, A. Harambe would’ve taken too long to become immobilized, and could have really injured the child in the process as the drugs used may not work quickly enough depending on the stress of the situation and the dose B. Harambe would’ve have drowned in the moat if immobilized in the water, and possibly fallen on the boy trapping him and drowning him as well.

Many zoos have the protocol to call on their expertly trained dart team in the event of an animal escape or in the event that a human is trapped with a dangerous animal. They will evaluate the scene as quickly and as safely as possible, and will make the most informed decision as how they will handle the animal.

I can’t point fingers at anyone in this situation, but we need to really evaluate the safety of the animal enclosures from the visitor side. Not impeding that view is a tough one, but there should be no way that someone can find themselves inside of an animal’s exhibit.

I know one thing for sure, those keepers lost a beautiful, and I mean gorgeous silverback and friend. I feel their loss with them this week. As educators and conservators of endangered species, all we can do is shine a light on the beauty and majesty of these animals in hopes to spark a love and a need to keep them from vanishing from our planet. Child killers, they are not.”